No, Bernie Does NOT Want To Protect Whistleblowers

A few days ago, Bernie Sanders announced his support for protection of whistleblowers. What his supporters have missed in this TALKING POINT is the very obvious omission of any suggestion of protection, objection to the prosecution of or statement that he would pardon Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning.

It has been months since Tulsi Gabbard issued the statement that, if elected, she would pardon Assange and Manning.

This is notable because in his much-touted 40+ years in office, Sanders has never once made a statement in favor of whistleblowers. Until now. He is only making his statement now that the DNC is screaming to protect whistleblowers coming forward with questionable, closed-door, hidden, “classified” information against Trump.

That’s interesting because I would consider a whistleblower to be someone who releases information to the public. Maybe that’s too tight of a definition but in this case, corruption on both sides is being considered, including Biden and his son. Biden’s son is not a government official. So, why do we not get to hear this evidence? It involves billions of dollars of US taxpayer dollars which went to a literal Nazi regime in Ukraine by Biden/Obama. Versus the question of whether $400 million was withheld by Trump to the new non-Nazi administration now in place. To date, there has been no public evidence connecting the Trump funds with the investigation. The evidence is coincidental at best.

While Kiriakou was in prison, Sanders never supported whistleblowers. When Snowden was exiled to Russia, Sanders said nothing. When Manning was being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment, considered torture by the UN Human Rights Council, Sanders said nothing. As of right this minute, Manning is being imprisoned on double jeopardy, against US law while Assange has been well documented showing obvious signs of torture. Sanders remains silent on the subject.

This is your “Progressive”?!!!

Sanders continues promoting Russiagate on all levels, from his rhetoric to his policies. I’ve explained what dangers are inherent in Russiagate if allowed to continue.

On one side of the whistleblower issue we have whistleblowers who revealed torture by our government. Who revealed murder by our military of civilians, journalists and children. Who revealed the perjury of the CIA director in front of CONgress while documenting illegal, warrantless mass surveillance of the US and global population. Who revealed election rigging by the DNC. Who revealed US government funding and arming of terrorist groups in the Middle East. Sanders has not spoken a single word, even as of today, endorsing protection of those whistleblowers.

On the other side we have a whistleblower who heard second hand accounts of a phone call to a foreign leader regarding a vague reference regarding a corruption investigation involving a US candidate highly likely to lose while displaying very obvious signs of advancing neurological deterioration. THAT so-called “whistleblower” sparks a statement from Sanders of protecting whistleblowers.

Yet it is worse than that. Let me make this abundantly clear, for those of you in the cheap seats. The Ukraine investigation DOES NOT involve Biden directly. It involves his CIVILIAN SON. This is an equivalent to the fact that the DNC is NOT a government agency, it is a PRIVATE organization!!!

So, Sanders will protect those who are suspected of corruption, including those who impacted the 2016 election, as long as those suspects are members of the DNC. Yet he will still claim to be against corruption. He will promote an agenda which pushes us ever closer to war, which supports murderous sanctions in other countries for the benefit of oil and weapons companies.

At this point I absolutely reject the claims of Sanders and his supporters to be “Progressive”. Each and every one of them are nothing but opportunists with an eye on their own profit margin. They are just as warmongering, corrupt, Zionist, nationalistic, selfish, apathetic and bloodthirsty as anyone they disparage on the far right. They just don’t admit to it openly.

So, You Want To Protect Whistle Blowers?

This past week, the Democrats filed for impeachment proceedings and have been riled up about protecting a whistle blower who reported Trump’s call to the Ukrainian president.

One interesting thing about this is that this whistle blower did not actually witness the call, from all appearances. Instead, he heard about the call from someone who heard about the call from someone who heard the call.

That’s fine. I support protection of whistle blowers in all cases. Though I already made a video examining the transcript of that call and it’s another nothingburger. Frantic ranting of deranged neoliberals literally protecting the corruption of one of their own elite. Not to mention another attempted distraction to keep from having to discuss policies or answer for their attacks on Progressive voters.

The most hypocritical thing of which I am sure you are aware is the continued incarceration of Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden and Julian Assange. The same democrats were completely silent when John Kiriakou was convicted in 2012 under the Obama administration.

Let’s compare what was revealed by each of these with the current, unnamed whistle blower.

Chelsea Manning forwarded information to the media regarding US military murder of journalists and civilians in Iraq. While these events were reported by many media outlets, what is most known about was her connection with Julian Assange, who published documents provided by Manning which revealed the murder of civilians by US military forces in Afghanistan, most notably the video which you can still view on YouTube titled “Collateral Murder”. In that video, US forces fired on 10 civilians, including two Reuters journalists and children in a van. She also forwarded documents regarding the torture of detainees held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

John Kiriakou was a CIA analyst and counter-terrorism officer who leaked documents revealing the torture of detainees by waterboarding. It was later revealed that the case of waterboarding he revealed was not the singular instance Kiriakou knew about. That person was waterboarded a total of 83 times.

Julian Assange is a journalist and chief editor of Wikileaks. Contrary to the image portrayed in the US media, Wikileaks publishes leaked documents from countries around the world, including tens of thousands of Russian documents. Wikileaks does not hack anyone at all but receives documents from leakers who obtain the documents and provide them. Wikileaks protects their sources yet provides the evidence to the public, which have been journalistic standards for decades. Most notable have been the Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay documents provided by Chelsea Manning, above. Then the leaked DNC emails during the 2016 election cycle which revealed intentional election rigging by the DNC.

Something which should absolutely be noted about the DNC leaks. Veteran intelligence professionals have analyzed the data rate of the transfer which illustrated clearly that the emails were not hacked but leaked by a person with internal access to the emails. Julian Assange and Wikileaks have never revealed the source of the emails.

The most important thing to note is that the DNC is not a government agency. It is a private political organization. No information residing on their servers can be considered classified or in any way relating to national security. The DNC receives federal funding, provided courtesy of your tax dollars. The DNC charter contains provisions for conducting primaries fair to all candidates. Even so, they used the defense in court when sued for fraud that they had no obligation to provide a fair primary. The actual words in court were that they could choose their nominee “in a smoke filled back room”.

Kiriakou spent years in federal prison. Manning spent years in federal prison in isolation where she became suicidal multiple times due to the emotional stress. Julian Assange has spent years in virtual incarceration in the Ecuadorian embassy, knowing the US would have him deported to the US to stand in unfair, closed door trial in which the public would not be allowed to hear the proceedings. Earlier this year he was arrested by the UK authorities and is currently in Belmarsh prison, in failing health, awaiting deportation to the US. Manning is again incarcerated related to the same charges she already served time for, which is double jeopardy.

Edward Snowden was an NSA contractor who revealed the fact that our own government spies on us. All of our electronic communications are monitored and recorded at all times. For revealing that truth, he was forced into exile in Russia. This occurred in 2013, under Obama. He remains in exile in Russia to this day. Recently, the US government seized the profits from his memoir, the number one selling book in the country.

So, we have whistle blowers who have revealed mass surveillance of innocent civilians, torture, murder and illegal rigging of elections. The Democrats have not only not protected these whistle blowers but played very active roles in the charging and conviction of each whistle blower named. They remain actively opposed to the release of Manning or Assange. They remain opposed to the exoneration of Snowden.

To make this clear, the charges against Assange do not stem from the release of the DNC emails. He is being indicted for the release of information regarding the Afghanistan Papers and the video, “Collateral Murder”.

Now, compare to the current whistle blower. The DNC wants this whistle blower protected. His revelation? That Trump inquired about a dropped corruption case in Ukraine which involved the company Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, worked for. Joe Biden is seen on a widely disseminated video where he literally brags about successfully blackmailing the previous Ukrainian president to fire the prosecutor in that corruption case. Using $1 billion of your money as a bribe. Nothing about this is classified. Nothing involves torture. Nothing involves murder of civilians.

Which whistle blowers do you think deserve the most protection from prosecution?

One can also consider those who leaked the Steele Dossier to be whistle blowers. To name names, the one who leaked that to the media was John McCain. He was protected. The Steele Dossier was unquestionably a fabrication, most likely by Ukrainian officials. Trump appeared too friendly during his campaign to Russia, so Ukraine did not want Trump in office. The Dossier was used to obtain illegal FISA warrants on multiple occasions, on multiple people. Yet nobody involved was ever charged, even while the DNC and the FBI paid for the Steele Dossier, not one allegation of which was ever confirmed.

The media is in a feeding frenzy. The Democrats want to keep the scope of the impeachment proceedings narrowed not only to the transcript of the Ukraine call but to focus entirely on one paragraph of the transcript. In addition, they expect that no defense can be mounted, no witnesses, no countering documentation and no video evidence offered.

I know many people want to see Trump impeached. There are many charges for which he truly should have been considered for impeachment. The separation of families, violating the Constitution for his treatment of immigrants, war crimes (along with many others, including Hillary and Obama) are among those charges. Using the Ukraine transcript/call sets an alarmingly dangerous precedent. Once that precedent is set, it will be nearly impossible to erase. It opens the door for the Republicans to use similar charges of impeachment against future Democrat (or other) presidents. That is all aside from the fact that we wind up with Pence as president.

Some people believe this will never come to a vote but be dropped by the Democrats before it does. I personally expect the Democrats to drag the issue out, stalling all the way through 2020. No matter how we look at it, this is all theater.

The most dangerous precedent of all being set is the protection of a whistle blower based on protection of documented corruption by a DNC party elite, while whistle blowers who revealed literal war crimes and electoral crimes by our own government are punished. There is nothing about this which is democracy. There is nothing about this which is freedom. There is nothing about this which is justice.

I would say America no longer exists but that would be disingenuous. America very much exists. This is who we have always been.

NOW You Have A GOOD Reason To Impeach Trump!!

Many of you have wanted a reason to impeach Trump and call him a traitor. Now you have it!!

I am referring to the charges against Julian Assange. The charges against Assange are an absolute violation of the First Amendment.

It does not matter if you agree with him, like him, etc. If you believe any of the rumors that he is a bad house guest, smells bad, is arrogant or even if you think he raped someone when you have never looked into the history of that allegation. None of that has anything to do with freedom of the press.

Guess what? You will never agree with every journalist you come across. It’s doubtful you ever criticize another journalist for saying things you want to hear. If you believe in the Russiagate religion, have you ever criticized Rachel Maddow for not “reporting” (sic) anything which throws doubt on Russiagate?

Have you ever watched the video which first brought Wikileaks to the public eye? Where US military were shown killing civilians, including two children and two Reuters journalists in cold blood while laughing? If you have never seen it, then it is crucial for your understanding that you do watch it. This is what our military covered up. You can watch the video here.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rXPrfnU3G0

That video is what is being termed espionage.

That video is why Chelsea Manning spent years in prison, much of it in solitary isolation, repeatedly suicidal during that time. That video is why Manning has again been arrested. Have you ever heard of double jeopardy?

That video is why Assange has spent years in the Ecuadorian embassy, knowing the US would have him extradited and charged. That video is why his prediction came true.

Assange is not being charged with anything having to do with the leaks in 2016 of the DNC. He could not be charged with espionage for that because the DNC is a private organization, NOT a government agency.

No, Wikileaks did not hack anyone. They publish documents which are provided to them by whistle blowers.

No, Wikileaks does not only publish documents regarding the US government. They publish documents from governments around the world. Yes, that includes the Russian government. If you have never seen the Wikileaks website yet have an opinion about it, you need to know just what you are talking about. Go there now. https://wikileaks.org/

No, there is no verifiable evidence that Russia had anything to do with the DNC leaks.

All evidence as analyzed by Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) has determined that the DNC data was leaked, not hacked. https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/

The corporate media is only now coming to some minor realization that the indictment of Assange has troubling implications for them as well. Until this week, they have never once defended him and by extension you. All they care about is their profit.

So yes, obliteration of freedom of the press should be considered an impeachable offense. Yet the Democrats are not going to defend Assange. That would absolutely destroy their Russiagate narrative which they have perpetuated for 3 years at extreme cost (at least $30 BILLION) and risk of war with a country with more advanced nuclear technology than our own. Their strangle hold on power, their absolute denial of wrongdoing is more important than your right to know what our government is doing.

However, impeachment for this should not be a consideration. Absolute opposition, yes. Impeachment, no. I’ve asked before, if Trump is impeached, what then? Would that mean the charges against Assange would be dropped? Does it mean that the members of both parties and the “Intelligence” community (sic) will support our rights? Would it mean diplomacy instead of fever-pitch international tensions? Would it mean we would have no more rigging of our elections? That corporations would not hold your fate in their hands?

No, no, no and hell no.

All impeachment would mean would be an insane power struggle and your input would not be welcome in the least. First, Pence would be next in line for office. You think he is better than Trump? Have you not paid attention at all? Think the AL abortion bill is bad? Pence would be an absolute theocrat! Anti-abortion, anti-gay, pro-war, pro-regime change, pro-corporate.

For what? One year?

No, what we need is for Democrats and Independents to stand up for our rights. We need candidates who openly support Progressive policiesincluding actual transparency (not another Obama).

None of this is going away soon. The most important thing is for you to be informed and involved. Pay actual attention to what is being said and not said by your preferred candidate. Stop worshiping names!!!

BTW, if you support the indictment of Assange, that makes you a traitor as well. Because you personally oppose your own Constitutional rights. If we do not have freedom of the press to expose the wrongs of our government, then all hope is gone.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

I am an independent writer with no corporate sponsors or backing. The only income I make from my writing comes from views. At least I have reached the point where it makes more than it costs me! lol! My writing is done in between full time (and overtime) nursing, shared custody of my brilliant daughter and mundane existence.

Please consider becoming a patron on Patreon. I try and average at least 20 articles a month, so a $1 a month donation would come down to 5¢ per article to support independent, non-corporate writing. My Patreon page is here.

If you care to share articles with those who do not have Medium or Patreon accounts, I also post most of my articles on my own website, which has no advertising and I pay for with income from writing. My website is here and all articles can be shared freely. You can always quote me, no attribution required. My goal is spreading information and awareness. The whole point is building a better, more peaceful, more equitable world for us and future generations.

It’s Not Just About Assange

The arrest and possible extradition of Assange is not just about Assange. Some people are too blind, too brainwashed, too indoctrinated to see this.

It is not just about Assange.

It is not just about election fraud.

It is not just about Trump.

It is not just about Hillary.

It is not just about Russia.

It is not just about freedom of the press.

It is not just about freedom of speech.

It is not just about honesty.

It is not just about justice.

It is about freedom in general.

It is about fighting fascism.

It is about hearing the truth, even when we do not want to.

It is about knowing what our government is doing, even when we do not want to.

It is about true journalism, which challenges power and takes risks courageously.

It is about survival.

It is about us.

It is about me.

It is about you.

It is about the future.

It is about time to wake up.

Mueller Probe Is Over!! Now, Let’s Talk About Julian Assange

The Mueller probe is finally at an end. Predictably, it comes to nothing related to the special counsel powers granted to Mueller in the first place.

Contrary to the beliefs of rabid Russiagaters, no convictions have resulted from anything related to any “Russian collusion”. Every conviction has been related to regular DC corruption. Lobbying, tax fraud and lying. In some cases, the lies were told after the election. Many of the indictments were pure theater, which I pointed out at the time. Seriously? Indicting Intelligence officials of another country in US court while refusing to divulge “evidence”? How was that anything but theater?

Original authorization. If you ever actually read the authorization which enacted the special counsel, you would know it was biased in the wording from the very beginning. It specifically states authorization to investigate “any links and/or coordination bet ween the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”. Notice that it precludes any connection to any other candidate.

I’m not going back over the whole process. It’s over and not worth it. It’s just more than a little interesting that the Clintons made money directly from Uranium One, which directly implicated Mueller and handed 20% of uranium processing to Russian interests. Uranium One was also proven to involve bribery, coercion, unaccounted for uranium shipments and more. While Mueller signed off on the intelligence approval required for Uranium One.

Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Declassification. Now the Democrats are calling for the full declassification of the Mueller report. More than a little amusing, since it was the Democrats who opposed the release and declassification of the text messages between FBI officials which revealed bias in the FBI investigation.

I am fully in favor of the declassification and release of the full report with all supporting documents and video/voice recordings. No FOIA requests necessary, release it for everyone globally to download and access. Allow independent media to examine the whole thing.

Mueller now crucified. For the last two years we have listened to MSM and centrist neoliberals screaming, “Wait for the Mueller report!” and “Protect Mueller! Don’t let Trump fire Mueller!” Now that Mueller has released his report, the cries have changed to accusing Mueller, claiming Mueller has been compromised by Russia. So Saint Mueller has now become a demon in their eyes.

More investigations. We already had a House investigation and a Senate investigation and each one came to the conclusion that there was no evidence of Trump/Russia “collusion”. Keep in mind that the Mueller investigation examined the FBI investigation into this subject. Not long ago I noted that the Democrats, before the Mueller report was even released, announced 17 investigations into the information contained in the Mueller report! So what happens when those 17 “investigations” do not come up with the results they want? Will we then accuse everyone involved in every one of those investigations? So, will we have investigations into each of the 17 investigations which investigated the Mueller investigation which investigated the FBI investigation?

Russiagate is not benign. I wrote a piece not long ago about how harmful Russiagate has been. You can read the long version here. In brief, Russiagate has led to a massive $100 billion increase in defense spending in just two years. It has led to censorship of independent media, which has been basically the only media contradicting the Russia narrative, especially on the left. In all cases, any anti-war voices have been demonized and attacked. It has led to increased US military presence on the Russian border and attempts to block Russian shipping routes. It has led to false accusations against any candidates who promote Progressive policies such as Medicare For All, decreasing military spending, ending wars or supporting Black Lives Matter as being Russian stooges/agents/trolls..

Nothing but a diversion. The effect of Russiagate on the functioning of our government has been tragic. So much effort and rhetoric has been exerted pushing Russiagate that virtually nothing else has been done. If elected officials are spending all their time on this, not talking about anything else, accusing anyone who opposes their narrative of being a Russian troll, what gets done? Or rather, what gets done that we want done?

No electoral changes. Notice that with all the accusations of Russian interference, claims of hacking, etc that we have not seen any effective changes in our electoral process as a result? No mandatory paper trails. No changes in software or processes to eliminate chances of hacking. No changes to campaign finance. The few changes we have seen have the express purpose of insuring that the DNC favorite, the Establishment candidate for president will be the DNC nominee.

Julian Assange. For all the claims put forward by the DNC about Russian “interference” in our election, nothing stands out like the attacks on Julian Assange. The claims from day one have been that Assange colluded with Russia, who hacked the DNC servers. There has been no evidence at any point to this effect. No financial ties between Wikileaks and Russia have been demonstrated. Most importantly, none of the four “investigations” have ever directly examined or subpoenaed the DNC servers. The four “investigations” include FBI, House, Senate and special counsel. Every single one of them relied on information relayed by Crowdstrike, a firm hired and paid by the DNC. Crowdstrike has also been discredited on more than one occasion, including making the claim that Russia hacked artillery in Ukraine, which was refuted by the Ukrainian military. The big question here is, when does an “investigation” not look at the alleged crime scene? When does a criminal investigation rely entirely on “evidence” obtained by a private firm paid for by the accuser?

The DNC is not a government entity. The DNC is a private organization, not a government agency. They used that fact as a defense in court in the DNC Fraud lawsuit. This means their internal emails are not subject to FOIA requests. They can keep their emails and documents private forever. They are funded privately, they operate in any way they choose. They are not required to offer a fair primary process, even though taxpayers fund the primaries. In addition, because the DNC is a private organization, an attack on the DNC is NOT a risk to national security. There was absolutely NO information in any of the DNC emails which was or could be deemed classified by the US government. Information of private entities CANNOT be deemed classified. ESPECIALLY when it is handed off for management by a private company.

Hacking debunked. The alleged hacking of the DNC has been debunked by Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), a group of former government Intelligence professionals who have analyzed the data transfer rate and determined that it was too fast to have been transferred over any existing internet protocol. The data obtained in the DNC breach could only have been transferred locally to a storage device, such as a thumb drive. Which proves the DNC breach was an internal leak, not a hack.

Back to Assange. No, I did not go off on a tangent. This all comes together. The conclusion of the information above means several things.

1- Because the breach was an internal leak, not a hack, it shows Assange gained information from an American source internal to the DNC.

2- Because the DNC is a private organization, it means the government was not breached. Only an organization that considers itself not beholding to the democratic process, beyond questioning, beyond investigation, beyond criminal charges.

3- It should be obvious that Trump has no connection to Assange, as it has been revealed that it is the Trump DOJ which has a previously secret indictment of Assange, with collusion with the British government for extradition to the US for trial.

4- The internal leak information shows clearly that Wikileaks did not hack the DNC but obtained information from an external source.

5- None of the emails were debunked. The DNC tried claiming that the emails were fabricated. Tens of thousands of emails, with metadata included. Then claimed they were hacked. If someone were to fabricate emails, why would they bother to hack anything? The emails were real, they were accurate. They revealed what the DNC did to rig an election. Russia didn’t write the emails.

6- Because Obama, Hillary and Trump have all attacked Assange, it reveals that they are all on the same page. They fear transparency and will fight it by any means possible.

An attack on journalism. The attack on Assange is an attack on actual journalism. It is an attack on freedom of the press. It is an attack on whistle blowers. It is an attack on every single one of us. On our right to know what our government is doing. It is an attack on knowledge itself.

The end of the Mueller investigation should mean an end to the attacks on Assange. Though we know that is not going to happen. And we all suffer for it.

Manning and Wikileaks- This Is Fascism.. And It’s Nothing New

Yesterday Chelsea Manning was jailed for refusing to cooperate with a grand jury investigation into Wikileaks. Some people are cheering for this. They think, once again, that this has something to do with Trump and Russia. They are badly misinformed and voluntarily delusional.

This case has nothing to do with Trump and Russia. For Manning, this is double jeopardy because she is being jailed again for her actions for which she already served prison time, was tortured and became suicidal on multiple occasions, then finally pardoned by Obama, the same president who imprisoned her.

Manning refused to answer questions for two reasons. 1- This was referring to her previous testimony from years ago. 2- She is objecting to the grand jury process.

The second one is something which affects all of us in the form of democracy and justice. The grand jury system is held in secret and does not include the defense of the accused. Any person can be indicted without knowing the evidence being presented against them and held without charge. In this case, they are holding Manning in contempt of court.

The other thing that you should be concerned about is that this is a case of an attempt to prosecute a journalist and his source. Manning testified extensively about how she obtained and submitted her information regarding treatment of inmates at Guantanamo and the outright murder of journalists in Iraq by the US military. That is, she testified at her original hearing. There is no reason to repeat all of it, it is on record. There is no reason for her to testify at all. Except-

If anyone recalls, Assange at one point agreed to surrender to US authorities on condition of Manning being released and his hearing being public. There is no intention of making anything he has to say public and now they are threatening Manning again.

By involving Manning, the attempt here is to gain support for the persecution of Assange by the right wing, who has opposed his indictment. They oppose his indictment based on what he revealed about the DNC. Now they are bringing up ancient history to manipulate the masses.

Of course, the zombies who currently support the indictment of Assange do so based on his release of information regarding the DNC.

Keep in mind the DNC is a private organization, not a government agency. They used that fact as a defense in court to say they had no obligation to provide a fair primary. Those primaries are paid for by all taxpayers of all parties, including Independents who are frequently not represented in primaries and never represented in debates.

It really does not matter which side of the aisle you are on. Censorship and indictment of journalists is fascism. No, you cannot defend Trump blocking one CNN hack from the White House while condemning a true journalist who reveals the truth just because you don’t like that truth. Some people claim Assange is biased in what he released. They have no evidence he had anything to release about Trump or the GOP. Wikileaks releases what is provided to them. The exact same people have no problem with biased actors on MSNBC like Rachel Madcow, who gets paid $30,000 a day and has never risked anything in her career. They do not object to CNN, with their all-hate-Trump-all-the-time “reporting” (sic).

If you try and use Fox News as a defense, with their bias, I will compare you to a monkey throwing shit. You cannot complain about one monkey throwing shit and then throw your own and say it’s better.

Real journalists reveal the truth and defend it. Assange has spent years in isolation and risked his life for the truth. Manning spent years in prison for revealing the truth and nearly died.

Now what are YOU defending? Because it’s not the truth.

Julian Assange

I’ve been considering writing something about Julian Assange and Wikileaks for quite some time now. For brevity, I’ll just refer to Assange because basically he is Wikileaks. Because I stand so much for freedom of speech and the press, it may seem strange I have not written anything about him until now. However, so much has been presented by larger voices than my own, spoken with clarity, validity and passion. Lee Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, Caitlin Johnstone, Jimmy Dore have all spoken out about Assange, sometimes multiple times.

I highly respect to work of the people I mention. So the challenge for me was to find a different take on the issue which has not been covered. I hate repeating the same talking points, seeming to parrot what others have said, no matter how valid. Between the points that have been covered and having written extensively about censorship in the past.

There is one aspect which has been barely mentioned and it is something I tend to focus on a lot. What would Assange’s motive be, what profit would be in it for him?

If you ask this question openly to Russiagaters and Julian haters, you can never get a clear answer. It is always some vague nonsense about “sowing chaos”, “causing division” or some similar claptrap. I expect the reason they think there is any validity to their view is because these are people who can think no more clearly than the drama queens they are. These are people who are addicted to Jerry Springer, the Kardashians, Big Brother and other trailer trash, mindless shows that portray people of their own mindset, that causing problems is a valid profit motive in and of itself.

Anyone of even the slightest intellectual capacity does not think in those terms. The fact that those shows are popular in the US says a lot about this country and it is nothing positive.

If charges against a person are prosecuted in a court of law, to genuinely prove guilt three things must at minimum be proven- Means, motive and opportunity. In this case, means and opportunity are there. Motive is the aspect in question and yet MSM and influences in our own government attempt to divert all attention or make up the most insane, flimsy, unbelievable motive imaginable. Yet to reality show addicts it sounds completely reasonable. Though even on reality shows, the instigator is never satisfied with the initial drama. They continually attempt to add to that drama. Something Assange has not done.

The narrative of Russiagaters and Assange haters consistently make vague claims that Wikileaks and Russia are tied together, yet cannot offer any evidence to that effect. They claim Wikileaks has never published anything critical of Russia. Which is an indication they have never looked at the Wikileaks website, with tens of thousands of pages of Russian documents implication corruption in that country. Yet they ask you to believe. Never type in www.wikileaks.org and see for yourself.

They ask you to believe Assange promoted Trump by omission of leaked documents against Trump. They never mention that Wikileaks does not hack anyone, they publish documents which are provided to them and carefully verified. Which is why Wikileaks has never had to retract a single document in 12 years.

They ask you to believe that no person or organization could have altruistic ethics and standards in the pursuit of truth. Even as they claim to have those ethics while taking money from war profiteers. Money in steady streams which they stand to lose if enough people believe what Wikileaks publishes just enough to ask questions and demand answers. Their income sources have been known to lie, cheat, steal, cause the failure of nations, enslavement and outright murder of millions of innocent people globally. For the goal of enslaving and murdering millions more, as long as there is profit in it. Yet those war profiteers and their paid media, their owned elected officials are allegedly “the good guys”.

They ask you to believe that Wikileaks posted falsified images of DNC emails after they or Russia hacked the DNC servers. Yet they cannot explain why the DNC servers have never been subpoenaed or examined by the FBI. They cannot explain exactly what was inaccurate. They cannot explain why anyone would bother creating tens of thousands of false documents if they had gone to the trouble of hacking the DNC. They cannot explain why the DNC fired 5 people in July 2016 because of those emails. They cannot explain Seth Rich’s murder. They cannot explain why the DNC never released the original emails to illustrate any difference between the leaked and original documents.

They ask you to believe that Assange fears rape charges which were dropped in 2012. Or he fears going to court for not showing up for a court hearing related to the same dropped charges.

They ask you to believe he fears imprisonment so much that he has remained imprisoned for 8 years without medical or dental care.

They ask you to believe he wants to get rich while remaining incarcerated and unable to spend the money.

Where do you find any profit motive for Assange and Wikileaks in any of the above? They have been targeted and threatened, fought entire governments to remain online and continue publishing the truth.

Assange and Wikileaks are rare today but for so many of us are completely trustworthy, honorable and respectable. The absolute opposite of their detractors. They fight for truth.They fight for freedom of the press. They already belong in all modern history books and in future history books for generations as heroes. We should all strive to have that level of dedication to the truth.

The ones who all belong in prison are those whose guilt is revealed on the Wikileaks platform, who seek to silence and punish those who reveal the truth.